Library

The Hidden Cost Lever in IBM i Tier Pricing: Cores, Not Just Tiers

Updated August 15, 2026

It is a common misreading of IBM i licensing to assume a newer Power generation gets a pricing break on software tiers. It does not. P05, P10, P20, and P30 carry the same published per-core rate regardless of whether that core sits on a Power9, Power10, or Power11 chassis.

Where the real savings live

The lever is throughput per core. IBM's own benchmark data shows meaningful CPW gains generation over generation -- Power11's entry S1112 rates roughly 5.4% more total CPW than Power10's comparable S1012 configuration, and the generational gap from Power9 to Power10 is considerably larger. A workload that needed, say, six licensed cores on Power9 to clear a P20 ceiling might clear the same throughput requirement on four cores on Power10 or Power11.

Fixed by IBMPer-core tier price (P05-P50)
Fixed by IBMPer-user fees where applicable
Variable by generationCPW delivered per core
Variable by generationCores needed to clear a tier ceiling

Where this breaks down

This effect has diminishing returns. Once your workload is already comfortably inside a tier's core-count floor, buying a newer generation does not lower your software bill further -- you are already paying the tier's minimum. The core-count savings matter most for workloads sitting near a tier boundary, where a newer generation can drop you into a materially cheaper tier altogether or avoid an expensive tier upgrade.

Model this explicitly before assuming a hardware refresh pays for itself in software savings alone. See IBM i Tier Economics for the full tier table and Configuration Efficiency for where the core-count curve flattens.

Sources

Related Generations

More From the Library